Tag Archives: jobs
Bin Laden one, Obama one well maybe?
Obama may have stepped in another pile of dodo when he claimed he was the only one in America who had the testosterone to take out Bin Laden. And it doesn’t look like he obtained any mileage from his annual Bin Laden self aggrandizement. But when he threw Governor Romney into the mix, it gave most people a right look inside the workings of our president. Granted, when Bin Laden was executed, Obama did get a lot of praise and adoration from the young folks. But time is a wonderful medicament. The young people realized a year later that the death of Bin Laden did not make them any safer or prosperous. It could be argued that President Bush and his strategy and the use of water boarding has made the United States a fantastic deal safer. But folks like Biden believe that it is only a matter of time before innocent people will pay the ultimate price for being infidels. It appears that Obama’s female truth team forgot to do their homework. They should have sought the help of a focus group. The group would have found that the effect of Bin Laden is long over and it was allegedly buried at sea. But more importantly it was not Obama that executed Bin Laden it was the United States. It was President Bush’s team that place Bin Laden into hiding. As a result Bin Laden was rendered useless and a coward. It is not like he was a leader of an army like General Lee; he was more like a Manson character in a movie. President Bush through his CIA and advanced interrogation techniques kept the pressure on Bin Laden. And when they located Bin Laden, it was just a matter of time before he would be executed. As you may recall Bin Laden was offered to Clinton many times and he was too busy to deal with Bin Laden, he preferred to do the Hokey Pokey with Monica. The real question to question: Who was the larger coward? Was Bin Laden a coward for hiding all those years? Or was it Obama for executing Bin Laden without a trial? It has been established that Bin Laden could have been apprehended without his execution. It would also have been prudent to hide him away while the CIA and other Intel agencies deciphered the captured information. It would also be wise to waterboard Bin Laden to see if he could lead the troops to other evil men like Bin Laden. By executing Bin Laden, Obama place an end to all the trails leading to and from this Intel. Obama also place an end to using Bin Laden as bait. How many soldiers of Bin Laden would try to free Bin Laden? Set the bait and capture the terrorists. It is not likely that they would try to negotiate his release… or would they? Another opportunity lost. Some would argue that Bin Laden is not really dead but he is hidden in a room in the basement of the Whitehouse. But if he is hidden, then he can’t be used as bait. And if he is on U.S. soil then we need to have Holder read him his rights. Remember when Obama was going to close Gitmo. He was going to try the terrorists in U.S. Courts instead of as enemy combatants in military tribunals. Remember when Obama told you to go blow up your tires and save millions of gallons of oil a … day? Where is that Obama? By the way, that same Obama is President of the United States! So who is the largest coward? Would Governor Romney have executed Bin Laden? Would he have captured him if given the opportunity? Or would he look the other way like Clinton did? We really don’t know what Governor Romney would do because Obama executed Bin Laden first. To raise such a question seems a bit stupid. Next Obama will question if Romney can find a left-handed smoke shifter! It’s a question that is useless and really serves no benefit to Obama or the American Economy! But I reckon it does show that Obama lost any benefit from the execution of Bin Laden. When you can take down his compound guarded by a few men, you should start to wonder was Bin Laden really set up. Did Pakistan leak the Intel to the United States? It is possible that some where in the future the terrorists will strike again. This time they will not blame it on the evil infidels and their religion and prosperity. They will blame it on the fact that Obama killed Bin Laden and Obama did not give him a proper burial. It just seems that Obama is clueless when dealing with these people. He had a trump card and he threw it in the sea. He could have ruined what was left of Bin Laden’s organization after President Bush ruined most of it. But instead Obama took the coward’s way out. He would have used a drone if he could, but instead he place his men in harm’s way while he was playing golf. Let me see, do we really care if Obama is so full of himself that he assumes that he would be the only person in America that could capture Bin Laden? If he didn’t kill him, maybe then he could try to benefit politically by his capture. But he place an end to his advantage. Wouldn’t it be fantastic if Obama and his Truth team worked on the economy and getting those shovel ready jobs moving. I guess shovel ready means not that they are ready. It means that they are so well buried in the recesses of the liberal minds that we won’t be able to see them until 2013. Maybe Obama should stick to fixing his failed economy rather then stirring up things he really knows nothing about. Wouldn’t it be fantastic if one person could say he saved thousands of gallons of gas by blowing up his tires! How about a quart of gas? The point is Obama didn’t know what he was talking about then. He still doesn’t know what he is talking about and do you really want to see him elected for another 4 years. Guess what, Obama still won’t know what he is talking about. For once I can agree with Hope and Change. I Hope the American people are smart enough to Change the person that sits in the Oval Office of the Whitehouse. Instead of playing with Monica, this Democrat president is playing with your future. Everyday they plot to take away your pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness. Have you had enough! Bin Laden one, Obama one well maybe? by Dr. Phil Taverna syndicated from The Land of the Free .
Original post:
Bin Laden one, Obama one well maybe?
If Bush Had Done That
15414 Bedrock Dr Corpus Christi, TX, 78410 USA
support@ifbushhaddonethat.com • 361-443-4402
15414 Bedrock Dr Corpus Christi, TX, 78410 USA
support@ifbushhaddonethat.com • 361-443-4402
Dan Savage Bombs while Bullying Christians and Bashing the Bible
Gay anti-bullying spokesperson, Dan Savage, belittled, berated and bullied Christians the Bible and the Pope while addressing 3,000 high school students at a school journalism convention in Seattle, organized by the National Scholastic Press Association. Savage, a militant high profile gay activist who writes graphic sex columns tried to humiliate the Christian kids but went away as a bully himself, in a terrible show of self-indulgent hedonism. He is the head of the ‘It Gets Better Project,’ an activist group that is supposed to help gays make the transition out of the straight life into the wonderful courageous new world of the gay life. Apparently he sees himself as the guardian angel of those whose feelings may have been hurt or who are depressed because of the difficulties involved with the transition out of the world of the straights. While most people learn who they are as they mature and find their place in society, the gays need special help to get into their small sphere and they also need special laws and alerts for the use of non-politically right catch words and phrases that signal that they are being bullied. It is sensitivity training, courses in tippy toeing, self-esteem tripe and psychological bolstering all rolled into one. But apparently Savage can’t seem to fulfill his task without belittling others whose view of the gay life is not so glowing. He referred to Christians as pansy a**** as more than a hundred students along with their advisors left the conference in protest. He issued a halfhearted apology sometime later and then proceeded to his next venue where the rhetoric was repeated in all of its sorted glory. He proved to the world yet once again that those who espouse tolerance have a very high tolerance for their own brand of brow beating, bullying and blatant hypocrisy. While not really quoting chapter and verse of the bible he did mention the three most well-known books of the bible that decry the homosexual lifestyle, Leviticus, Timothy and Romans. He boasted that we have learned to ignore the bull**** in the bible and we should also learn to ignore the bible’s other prohibitions on shellfish, slavery, dinner, farming, virginity and masturbation. The shotgun approach to blasting the bible never works because the scoffers rarely if ever know the dispensations or the divisions of the scripture. Naturally speakers like Savage depend on the fact that their listeners don’t know these subtle, but extremely vital differences. In a post on May 1st Savage specifically blasted the practice of Christians who quote from Leviticus because it says homosexual activity is an ‘abomination.’ Declaring that the bible refers to all Ancient Testament moral, ceremonial or hygienic prohibitions as also being abominations is a very significant error. Dr. Michael Brown of the much loved “Question Dr. Brown” series addresses that error in his ‘Voice of Revolution’ website, May 3, 2012. Dr. Brown says, “Really, within Leviticus, only homosexual practice is singled out as an abomination, but elsewhere, the people of Israel are told that they should not eat shellfish (see Leviticus 11, although the word abomination is not used there)…” Brown also said, “When it comes to homosexual practice, not only is it the only sinful action singled out in Leviticus as an abomination, but it is part of a list of universal moral prohibitions, including incest and other forbidden sexual acts. We know this because the chapter states that the Lord judged the pagan nations for these very acts, and if acts were incorrect for idol-worshiping pagans, and they were incorrect for the people of Israel (see Leviticus 18:24-30). And when we see that the prohibition against homosexual practice is reiterated in the New Testament, the case is settled for those who accept the Bible as God’s Word.” As expected the mainstream media mostly passed over the details of this incident, but the conservative media has been generous, providing both details and follow ups. The one aspect of the event that seemed to have escaped the notice of all, was the fact that while hundreds of students walked out of the conference, many more stayed – and applauded Savage’s unlearned, ill-informed and anti-Christian remarks. Why were students cheering and applauding Dan Savage’s outbursts of hatred and error even while they were present to learn more about how to be more tolerant? This is a question that virtually no commentator has questioned. This is also the question that is too simple to answer. Our children are being taught a world view that denies absolutes. Situation ethics, personally derived morality and the view that all truth is subjective and relative, is at the heart of today’s academic system. High school and college level instruction holds that there are no more absolutes; there isn’t just black and white, but many shades of gray. Philosophic postulation is only allowed to question questions, no one is allowed an authoritarian platform on which to declare an actual answer. If philosophy were really color; where would this thinking end? Question the artist to believe that there is only gray and they will laugh at you. They depend on the absolutes of black and white in their art. All the colors are derived from primaries; there are no shades of purple without red and blue. But why distress the darlings with something that would only get them scorned or called a pansy. Even as teachers hail the individualism that produced today’s youth heroes and examples like Steve Jobs, any defiance against the rap of the nebulous nascent nonsense is met with wrath and rejection. Again this is no more than unseen and really un-acknowledged hypocrisy. The only remaining barrier to the emergence of today’s reprobation and moral decline is the bible. It is quick becoming the last line of defense, but a formidable defense it is. Bolstered by the Prez’s unprecedented stand with the homosexual agenda the gays have only this one immovable wall to hurdle. Will they succeed? Not a chance. Oddly, it is not some imaginary battle where excellent wins over evil but the prophetic says that evil under the banner of PC — (Political Correctness) and morality derived from — PCC (Pop Culture Consensus) will flourish as this generation progresses. Not only does the bible promise that even though evil will have its day, prophetically speaking that evil will suddenly be met face to face by the returning Lord Jesus Christ who will at his appearance dispel all the questions. When those with a world view look up to see him coming in power they will not call upon their college professors, scientists, politicians or peers to help them to cope with the events that follow. What they will do, is flee to the mountains, rocks and dens and question the rocks to hide them from the face of him who returns in resplendent glory and power. (Rev 6: 16) It is more than a curiosity that as an appendage to one of the most vital second coming passages in the entire bible called the ‘Olivet Discourse,’ Jesus re-affirmed that of all the words a man may take to heart, only his words will be left standing in the end, and those who stand on these words will be standing there with him alive and well at his second coming. “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” (Mt 24: 35) As for those kids in Seattle who walked out of the school I can say I wouldn’t mind having any number of them attending my church. I would venture to say their parents must be proud. Not only are they the jewels of heaven but they are the best of America and I would bet there are a few million Americans who would agree with me. Dan Savage Bombs while Bullying Christians and Bashing the Bible by Rev. Bresciani syndicated from The Land of the Free .
Go here to see the original:
Dan Savage Bombs while Bullying Christians and Bashing the Bible
Silver Spoon Obama: Is he Calling the Kettle Black?
I reckon Obama may have stepped in another mess when he pulled the silver spoon line. It is obvious he personally was attacking Romney, instead of doing it with his Super PACs. But what does it mean when Skippy says he was not born with a silver spoon and Michelle was not born with a silver spoon in her mouth. Obama has to be delusional. Just reckon about it, a poor black man writes a book about the dreams of his father and he makes millions of dollars. A poor black man is born in Hawaii and he goes to a private school in Hawaii. A poor black man on his way to Harvard Law School takes a small time (a month) to glide to Kenya to meet his relatives. I reckon Obama may be confused by the notion of a silver spoon. For Lady Obama as a poor black woman she ends up at Harvard Law School by way of Princeton. Tell me about all the poor black children that end up at Harvard Law School! I reckon we need to look at Silver Spoons a small different in our new free communistic world. So we have 2 types of silver spoons. There are spoons for capitalists and another style for communists. The problem is how do we measure the quality of the spoons and do they really help the average (forgotten) man and by how much? Capitalist’s Silver spoons are simple to discern. Take Bill Gates, he knew how to use people and use his resources properly and he is the richest man in America. Now Gates was probably not a poor person to start with. But his parents were not billionaires. People like Gates are able to see a vision and they go out and get it. And no matter what, small of an untimely death, Gates would be rich today. He understood money and he knew how to leverage its power to make billions. Most people don’t know these simple concepts. And most people don’t care. They don’t want to be rich, and they wouldn’t know what to do if they were earning that kind of money. It is like the folks that win the lottery. Most of those folks are ill prepared to handle all that money. It used to be they had 20 years to go through the money, but the States were so hard up for the tax money, they hand over all the winnings in one year so the state can spend the tax money in that year. Double taxation is a different kind of silver spoon. But the average person blows threw the winnings in no time because they are ill prepared to deal with the bonanza of cash! Trump was well prepared to become a billionaire because his dad was in the business. His son was able to take millions and turn it into billions. And it really doesn’t matter if you don’t like his hair; he knows how to deal with money. So are all these rich folks evil? And do they have a silver spoon in their orifices. Who really cares? If they have billions today, they are paying taxes, making millions of jobs, and in most cases they know how to handle the money. Idiots like Obama want to demoralize these folks because he is jealous of their money. But most Americans have no desire to be millionaires and they are pleased just to live the American Dream with their families. And the more money that people like Gates and Trump have or make, the more jobs and prosperity is shared by many Americans in a pure capitalistic society. Obama the Commie sees the world a lot different. Since his buddy FDR and LBJ came along people can become rich in other ways that are not capitalistic. In a nutshell they steal the money from the capitalists and the working forgotten man and give it to other people who use that money to become rich. For some reason, Obama and his liberal friends do not see this as a silver spoon. They see this as a right! There is one fundamental flaw in the commie’s thinking. When the capitalists like Gates make billions, they really produce a product and sell widgets and make millions of jobs. And all these jobs pay taxes to the government system. So look at it this way, let’s say we sell a million dollars worth of widgets. And we make $500,000 in profits. This profit trickles down to wages that in turn are converted to tax revenue. It becomes Gates’ widgets that make this fountain of capital. Nobody had to pay Gates to make the capital, he made it. So if Gates has a silver spoon in is oral portal, then he deserves it and it is beneficial to society and its prosperity. The Obamas’ silver spoons are a bit costly. They went to school on government financial aid. Did they make one capitalistic job in any of their career choices with their own money? It becomes obvious that Obama knew at an early age how to play the system. When he lived with the Ayers while he was in law school he said he was going to be president. It appears that Obama had already made the proper connections before he ever made it to Law School. Were these connections Obama’s silver spoon? Now tell me, is this the Silver Spoon that Obama was born with. He makes $425,000 a year for life, plus goodies that will amount to millions if not billions a year. Last year Obama paid about $300,000 in taxes with government money. Governor Romney paid about $3 million in taxes. I reckon that Obama was born with certain opportunities that were available to him that would never be available to you and me. And like anyone else that is successful, he knew what to do with it. Governor Romney as well was born with some advantages, and he too knew how to capitalize on the advantages. To say either one was born with a silver spoon is a bit arrogant. But today they are both rich and successful. But who has done more for society? Who do you want as a citizen? Do you want a government worker who pays $300,000 in taxes or the capitalist that pays over $3 million dollars in taxes? And reckon about it, Governor Romney has the experience to make jobs; Obama has only been successful in sending American Jobs to China through his excellent friends at GE and Solyndra. And in the end who do you want to lead the country? Do you want people like Obama who are natural born system suckers, who spend government money to the benefit of their friends and their families, or a capitalist who has made widgets not paid for by the government that results in adding prosperity and capital to our community and financial society? They both have silver spoons, but which silversmith do you want making policy for prosperity in 2013? My vote is stay away from the communists disguised as progressives. They seem to get rich, but nobody else does. Businessmen like Gates have made many people rich by producing widgets and capital. We should applaud them and encourage them to make more. Obama wants to ostracize them from your community and send their revenue to China! Which Silver Spoon do you reckon is best for America and your future! Silver Spoon Obama: Is he Calling the Kettle Black? by Dr. Phil Taverna syndicated from The Land of the Free .
Follow this link:
Silver Spoon Obama: Is he Calling the Kettle Black?
